Should PS3 have been made as PSX instead?

[windbane]

Vienna said:

windbane said:

bdbdbd said:
PS2 isn't a system that needs to be replaced? About 40% of PS2:s i know, are re-buys because old console has broke. Just like Hus would say "i want my kiddii fixed".

What is this in response to?

you said in one of your postings that you never had problems with ps2.

and i must agree with bdbdbd response: i know also some people which bought minumum two ps2s...

i remember the time when i worked at a game developer company and in our party room

the ps2 died after 1 year. and many dvds had scratches...

 

but anyway - this is discussed in another tread weeks ago

 

to the topic:

i don't think a multimedia ps3 makes sense ... i personaly prefer the idea of a cheaper ps3 (maybe no blueray) with more games -> but its too late now: it is how it is :)

 

 

Yeah, I was afraid it was in response to me, because I never said I didn't have problems with the PS2.  I said I have not had any problems with the PS3, and most people haven't.  I had to replace my PS2 at one point but have not had a problem since then.  I know some that had disc read errors and replaced their consoles when there are ways to fix that.

So, again, I ask what it was in response to.  I'll say it again:  I have not had any problems with the PS3, PS Three, Playstation 3.