By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
seece said:
wholikeswood said:
seece said:
wholikeswood said:
seece said:
wholikeswood said:

Sorry, but where exactly in this thread did I hate on Microsoft? Please, I implore you, show me these posts you speak of.

If I say "I don't think Reach can make 10mil as the main trilogy is complete", it's not an attack on Microsoft. This most recent post of yours ultimately betrays your gross over-sensitivity. Seriously, grow a thicker hide and learn to accept that people can hold views that oppose yours without the former being somehow automatically illegitimate.

Well first off I must say I love how you word your posts, so intelligent, its almost as if you use it as a way of intimidating people. Really boy this is a forum, is their much need for you to be in the mindset this in an English essay?

You can defend your posts all you like, not all hate on Microsoft, but they most certainly are negative, you can't deny that as you know your soul purpose for coming on this site is to be negative towards Microsoft.

And please don't try and psychoanalyse me, I'm not over sensitive to anything you write.

The difficulty you seem to have is that you pick a fight when a post seems to you negative when in truth it's only what someone thinks is the most realistic or probable outcome, and surely posting what you think most realistic or probable is the best way to participate in these kinds of prediction threads?

I don't have to apologise or keep my mouth shut just because my belief (say, that Reach won't hit 10mil) conflicts with what you want to see happen.

Its only negative because its coming from you, don't you see, its not so much what you said, its who its coming from. At least Crazzyman can blame it on the fact he is a joke account.

At the end of the day, if it were say Montana that said it, I probably wouldn't have viewed it the same way. But every post I see of yours reads the same, negative towards Mirosoft, sometimes you sugarcoat it, sometimes you don't.

Hey there is more chance of Reach being <10 mill than over, I don't disagree with most of your resoning, I don't agree with it either, but like I said, there is nothing to suggest Halo has peaked.

and ignore what Montana said he always underestimates Halo *cough*10.5 million jan 09 *cough*

 

And with that you reveal that you judge my posts not for their worth or nature but on the identity of their author.

Ad hominem. It's a fallacy when debating. You should avoid it, rather than subscribe to it.

The way it should be, I see you as incredibly biased.

Really don't give me any advice.

No, that's not how debating works.

You judge a contribution on its merits. It doesn't matter a hang how biased a person is if his post is fair...

If you can't appreciate this, then it's pretty pointless taking this argument any further.