wholikeswood said:
The difficulty you seem to have is that you pick a fight when a post seems to you negative when in truth it's only what someone thinks is the most realistic or probable outcome, and surely posting what you think most realistic or probable is the best way to participate in these kinds of prediction threads? I don't have to apologise or keep my mouth shut just because my belief (say, that Reach won't hit 10mil) conflicts with what you want to see happen. |
Its only negative because its coming from you, don't you see, its not so much what you said, its who its coming from. At least Crazzyman can blame it on the fact he is a joke account.
At the end of the day, if it were say Montana that said it, I probably wouldn't have viewed it the same way. But every post I see of yours reads the same, negative towards Mirosoft, sometimes you sugarcoat it, sometimes you don't.
Hey there is more chance of Reach being <10 mill than over, I don't disagree with most of your resoning, I don't agree with it either, but like I said, there is nothing to suggest Halo has peaked.
and ignore what Montana said he always underestimates Halo *cough*10.5 million jan 09 *cough*







