finalsquall said: That's a pretty dubious claim, since there have been no reports suggesting that is what consumers in Europe prefer. No, YOU find it annoying. Get some statistics before you claim you speak for everyone. Like I said before. In the 90's it was cool, it was like man this game is so big it must kick ass and they usually did i.e. ff7 and ff8. Then the ps2 came out and lets say ffx ... it fits on one disc... The problem there is you can't prove the PS2 games would have done worse if they were on multiple discs. which was weird, but awesome at the same time. It was good to put the disc in and play and play and play. If one disc got scratches (not that mine do.... but alot of ppl don't value their disc) you were screwed. If it can't be repaired, then your forking out for a whole new game. If you take care of your games, they won't get scratched. This rule also applies to one disc games. Talk about ignorance of technology, or even math. It's capacity vs data. That hasn't magically disappeared with blu-ray. Blu-ray would have to have INFINITE capacity for that to happen. Blu ray will demonstrate the need for higher capacity. HDD could work but not everyone has the space over time or the internet to patch for updates. |
A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.
Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs








