By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
TheRealMafoo said:
akuma587 said:

Mafoo, for instance, says he has never believed in human-caused global warming BUT NOW when some data finally comes out that could support it, he acts as if he has been correct all along. That's like a creationist who doesn't believe in evolution who latches onto intelligent design for dear life as soon as it gets a tiny bit of support in the scientific community. Its like people who don't like paying high taxes latching onto supply-side economics even if the underlying principles behind supply-side economics are questionable, and remain so. It verges on intellectual dishonesty.

What?

That’s ridicules, and about as farfetched as someone has gone to try and insult me.  If that’s the best you can do, just let it go and wait until you make something up that’s less stupid.

I never believed in manmade global warming based on many scientific data points. The idea that more data I didn’t know about comes along to strengthen my views  somehow makes my conclusions less valid is well… just stupid.

It’s like me saying that if you eat rotten food, you will get sick, and then we learn that people are getting sick somehow discredits my original beliefs, because I didn’t know about those sick people.

What a weak ass argument.

What is the origin of the CO2 if you don't believe is manmade? (If you allready stated that then i'm sorry for asking and i'll check)

Cause CO2 concentration is indeed rising and affecting all the earth like i said.