By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
FreeTalkLive said:
SHMUPGurus said:
theRepublic said:
FreeTalkLive said:
MontanaHatchet said:
Super Mario Galaxy. At the risk of getting a tomahawk thrown at me, I think the game was too significant, magical, and iconic to be followed up with a sequel. I would rather have seen a whole new Mario game, set in a new location and with completely different things to do.

Wait for the game to come out first.  Everything I've read about it makes it seem better than the first one.  And the sequel will not hurt the image of the first one if it doesn't live up to the legend.  Look at Super Maio World and Yoshi's Island.  SMW is still near the top of the list for 2D platformers.

What are you saying?  Yoshi's Island was an amazing game.

I don't think he said it was a bad game, but he did say that Yoshi's Island didn't hurt Super Mario World's image even if it wasn't as good as SMW. I think anyone can agree with that (or at least the novelty factor).

Look at the VC charts.  Clearly people love SMW. 

Anyway, just to say it again, Montana couldn't be any more wrong.

Oh my god, did nobody read? How many mainline Mario games (Super Mario 64, Sunshine, etc.) have had direct sequels only a couple of years later? And how many of them were good? You couldn't be any worse at comprehension.