Games that should've never gotten a sequel

[SHMUPGurus]

zexen_lowe said:

SHMUPGurus said:

zexen_lowe said:

SHMUPGurus said:

zexen_lowe said:

SHMUPGurus said:
But... we love Pokémon that way. Why change a formula that works?

Because there's a time that it stops working...specially when the new Pokemons (the creatures, I mean) can't hold a candle to the old ones

Pokémon is not selling anymore? News to me!

When did I say that? I just said it becomes tiring...

...for you. That's my point.

And the point of the thread, too. Dunno what's wrong with saying what I think

Nothing's wrong with that, I never said anything about it.

But we see that it works and it still sells, so it's not because someone says Nintendo should stop selling the same games that they should. Plus, most of the games are better gameplay wise so it's good that there have been sequels.

If you had said something like Final Fantasy X-2, and we all know it was clearly not better than Final Fantasy X (maybe gameplay-wise... but as a whole package nah), it would have been easier for me to swallow. In other words: Don't touch my Pokemans! D: