@akuma587
Here is the problem. There is as much evidence (in most peoples eyes, even more) that global warming is not man made. No one is saying it can't be man made, we are just saying if you look at the evidence, it doesn't remotely tell anyone that it is man made.
Most people, me included, will tell you we don't have the answer yet. The obvious conclusion is the fluctuation in the source of all our energy would tie closely to all our energy (that's all temperature is, energy). But that does not make it correct.
The problem I have with what the world is doing, is they are putting into place policy that will negatively impact people. No matter how you look at it, artificially raising the cost of energy will hurt so many people who rely on it. You either hurt the poor, or require the middle class to pay for the poor, and hurt them. You also impact every business that consumes energy. All manufacturing plants will have there costs go up. They will either move off shore (loss of jobs), or increase there prices to compensate.
Now if we knew humans were the cause of the worlds "climate change", then I could see how causing all these negative consequences could be worth the positive. The problem I have is it is far more likely that doing this will do nothing with respect to climate change, and all we will get out of it is the negative impacts.
I think it's always wise to figure out a problem before you try and solve it. It's been a long time since wise and washington went together.







