naznatips on 28 June 2009
| ZenfoldorVGI said: I think it is obvious that moving parts break more easily than no parts at all. Any moving part will eventually break. It might last 100 years, but it will break eventually. There is no need for one here. It doesn't protect the screen, so why have a sliding hinge? Also, why do I have to prove that you might have to rebuy your games, lol? I think you are being very naive if you think Sony is going to replace them for everyone absolutely free. You ARE losing screensize. Saying it is more portable...is damage control imo, but maybe some people would sacrifice a larger screen for portability, so I can concede that point. As for the price doubling...it's close enough. You lose screensize, a UMD drive, and gain nothing, yet you pay more, for slightly arguably increased portability? Again, why not buy the superior older model? What is better about the Go, besides marginally increased portability, that is worth the extra price? Especially after all you are sacrificing? I understand attacking me, but all I'm saying is the truth. Believe me, I am helping you, when I recommend that you buy the older model instead. You are getting ripped with the Go, as an early adopter. Frankly. |
The price difference is a 68% increase. The screen reduction is 12%. You say the price is "close enough" to doubling when you are off by 32% there but the screen reduction of a mere 12% is huge. Please don't make me ban you for such silliness. If you are going to be biased at least be consistent about it.
As I noted above, the Go is absolutely not better for gaming, but is perhaps the best value of a portable media player on the market.
