How many users on these boards actually support "The Theory of Evolution"?

[CHYUII]

ManusJustus said:

CHYUII said:

MACRO and MICRO are words in use by scientist. It is a way to specify specifically what you mean. Even if you buy all of the theory of evolution, it is good to have to different defintions for the 2 different processes.

The Micro only talks about the Gene Expressions in organisms and mutations and Natural Selection. This is proven science the rest is unproven speculation.

Macro evolution is micro evolution.  All evolution is DNA mutations.  If you admit that micro evolution is true, you admit that macro evolution is true.

I know that, for whatever reason, you have a strong desire for God to exist.  You want God to do things for you, you want to live in an eternal paradise, you want to see loved ones, and you dont want to die.  No one wants to die, but it is a fact of life.  We die and cease to exist, and there is no giant receptacle that catches the brain waves of every person when they die.  The only thing that matters is what you do on Earth for the short time you are here, and the more time you spend promoting regressive ideologies that go against the scientific progress that man has struggled for for thousands of years, the more precious time you waste.

Keep on believing.  If it makes you feel better and helps you cope with the harshness of life, then more power to you.  But dont waste your time trying to disprove solid scientific knowledge with misunderstandings and misrepresentations from others.  Gain an understanding of science on your own, or just leave science alone altogether.

LOL, you do not KNOW what I think about God; you just ASSUME that you know (by prejudice). I know many people who serve God that would rather he not exist but follow their god’s because the evidence leads them to do so.

Religiously, speaking there is no guarantee that a god would do anything for you a human. Nor, is there a guarantee that you will see better days by serving a god. Life can sometimes be easier without a God too (depending on how you look at it).

It is not always the “opiate” it is sometimes the “salt” in the wound.

 You make many assumptions about me and you make many assumptions about death. There is no scientific study that can show you what happens after death. You have taken your naturalistic philosophy, called it science, and used it to prove something science cannot prove.

What test can you do to prove the soul? And what test can you do to prove String Theory? As a scientist said in Elegant Universe (a Public Television/ secular documentary about String Theory aka The Theory of Everything aka M-Theory aka Unified Theory) - “If you can’t test it, it is philosophy, not science.”

I know the difference, do you?