Khuutra said:
If this is your distinction, you're only talking about a single game mechanic in turn-based strategy games. There is no such thing as a Strategic RPG unless you are talking about the narrative fact of playing a character - in which case Advance Wars is an RPG but Risk is not (assuming that you do not pretend to be a conqueror). |
I'm not sure I understand. Your first sentence and the rest of your post have nothing to do with each other. The rest is basically providing of an example of why story can't be the dividing factor.
As for the first part, a single gameplay mechanic is often built on a foundation of other equally simple gaming mechanics. In PC TBS games such as Age of Wonders and Heroes of Might and Magic, it's much easier to see all the things that go into the game such as area capture, resource gathering, castle/base building, building upgrading, and army raising. Advance Wars probably wasn't the best title to draw comparisons with since it simplifies and removes a lot of the more elaborate PC game mechanics.
So where are you going with this discussion? Are you agreeing with me? Disagreeing with me? I'm not clear on that.







