Rath on 24 June 2009
| Kasz216 said: Even then though there is the problem that the big name presidents have fanboys. It's like Videogame criticism but to an even greater degree. You don't get a doctorate in history or political science because your an unbiased observer. |
Oh yeah I totally agree really. But just like videogames its impossible to have a truly objective view of a president thats worth anything. I mean it'd be like rating games purely on the number of polygons and the resolution of the textures.
Anything thats subjective has inherent human bias and any ranking of presidents by historians will have bias - probably just less bias and more information than a list by the general public.
