By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Vetteman94 on 24 June 2009
Edit Thread
Noobie said:
Vetteman94 said:
Noobie said:
rafichamp said:

Firstly, Home is generating Sony a lot of revenue, ads, clothing, spaces, etc, etc. Folding at home costed Sony about 5 bucks, all you do is donate. Vidzone is great and will push casual music lovers in Europe to purchase a PS3. If I was Sony I would stop fooling around and sign contracts with Twitter, Facebook, AIM, Blockbuster.

maybe blockbuster but for other services i don't think PS3 is a preferred choice.. u can use a nettop or even palm will be more easy for these services.. that is wot i m saying. PS3 can never become ideal for these services. :)


Why cant the PS3 be ideal, but the 360 is?  Since it is getting some of those features

I didn't say that X360 is ideal.. the problem is that by launching X360 earlier, MS has already have a bigger library for X360.. so Sony first need to match X360 in game library department before matching the other features of X360.. this is just my point of view.


Well i was just saying that how can you say that the PS3 cant be ideal when its competitor is getting some of those features.   Of course the PS3 is ideal.   We arent talking about games library here,  MS didnt add these features as a substitute for games, they added them to enhance the entire Xbox Experience and to go with the games already released.   Thats what Sony needs to do as well,  broaden and enhance the experience on the PSN.  The games will be there regardless,  its not like Santa Monica studios is going to stop production GOWIII to work on a Facebook or a Twitter app. Sony will bring in people specifically for those projects just like they did with Home