ironman said:
Actually, they are, they even gave him more positive coverage than Bush. |
Sorry to pick on you here Ironman, but I want to show how the Obama campaign was so brilliantly run.
This post, and the one about 40% more face time then Bush, shows just how brainwashed people got last election.
Obama did not run against Bush, he ran against John McCain. It does not matter how much face time Bush got, or how much positive coverage vs. Bush he got. But he did such a good job portraying that he was running against Bush, that now that’s who we think of when we think of the alternative to Obama.
Everything Bush did that vilified him in the world, Obama continues to do (aside from Gitmo), and the people love him for it.
Anytime the US does something that’s hard to spin positive, we just say it’s inherited from Bush.
No, it’s not. Bush has absolutely nothing to do with that bombing. It once we sort the story out from the media, it was a good thing, it’s 100% Obama’s victory. If it’s a bad thing, it’s 100% Obama’s fault.
