kowenicki said:
The most telling part of that article......
"We must point out that neither Project Natal nor the PlayStation Motion Controller are finished products, so there's no telling how they might be
implemented in future games. For example, there's no reason that Natal couldn't make use of both motion sensing and traditional control, similar
to Sony's device. Furthermore, we'd say Sony is probably just as keen to capture some of the casual market as Microsoft."
|
But didn't Microsoft say that their product was superior specificly because it had no controller? Wouldn't putting in a traditional controler not only make them contradict that argument, but severely lessen the difference they want with their competitors?