How many users on these boards actually support "The Theory of Evolution"?

[Rath]

CHYUII said:
Evolution is a philosophy because scientific method can never be applied to it. We have no way of researching it, because we have no way of reproducing the moments in which life was created on Earth. If it is a fact then scientist would not still call it a theory.

It already has been researched, the scientific method has been applied to it. Testable predictions have been made. It has nothing to do with the origins of life (thats abiogenesis).

Statistically speaking it is very improbable that random chance gave rise to order

This would be true if it were truly pure random chance. However random chance only occurs with genetic mutations, these are then 'selected' (ie. natural selection) so that the best random mutations are the ones that remain in a species. Hence evolution isn't random chance giving rise to order.

(not to mention it is against the PROVEN Laws of Science).

This isn't the second law of thermodynamics again is it? We aren't in a closed system so the law does NOT apply. The sun and the activity of the core of the earth both supply an external source of power to our environment. Hence entropy is able to decrease within our environment as the entropy increases in those environments, they are part of a system with an overall increase in entropy.

Darwin said that if it could be proven that life forms did not become more complicated over a series of successive improvements, then his theory would be proven wrong.

Indeed it could. However the opposite has been proven.

Micheal Denton an atheist wrote a book called evolution: a theory in Crisis, He spent the first part of the book ripping religion. And then went on to make his case-

And he is not alone in those beliefs other scientist believe the same.

Denton has changed his tune and now believes in evolution. It doesn't stop both of his books (both the one that attacks evolutionary theory and the one which supports it)  being rubbish science that would never pass peer review.

I am not anti- science but I am Anti- Dogma and the theory of Evo. is sometimes just that.

No more so than say, the general theory of relativity.

I believe in Micro but not Macro.

Exactly the same process, just over different periods of time.

The rest is more in line with Intelligent Design because Intelligent Design is more inline with the ACTUAL LAWS of SCIENCE.

What laws are these?

But this is a free country and I do not mean to step on anothers beliefs, we are free to worship as we choose...

Or not worship, as may be the case ;)