Dear Halo haters

[Lost tears of Kain]

Rubang B said:
My problems with Sessler's arguments from the video:



1) "Halo 1 was so revolutionary in finally having an FPS that good on a console."

Nope. You're talking about GoldenEye on the N64. Rare beat Bungie to the punch by 3 years.

(In my opinion, part of the reason MicroSoft bought Rare and Bungie was because they think FPS games are the most popular genre in their target demographic. This is why they also made sure to get exclusives out of Half-Life 2 and Doom 3 on the old XBox. They wanted to make it a shooter box to steal that demographic before the 360 came out, so that games like Halo 3 could sell gazillions. They know what they're doing, but I digress.)

2) "The control scheme has not been beaten ON A CONSOLE."

Ooh nice try with that "on a console," but you're still wrong. Metroid Prime 3.

(I know it's not multiplayer, so it may be awkward comparing them, but comparing control efficiency only, Metroid is more efficient and immersive, in that it's closer to emulating keyboard and mouse or real guns.)

3) "Shove your **** in your mouth so I don't have to hear you anymore and you can finally get some satisfaction."

I put my **** in my mouth like you said, but it wasn't satisfying. It's like trying to tickle myself. It just doesn't work. Now I'm just sitting here bored looking like a dumbass with my **** all wet. Fuck you Sessler.

Yes goldeneye was great, i still never had the feel like i first picked up halo on the 360 controller, so technically goldeneye may of had it done in terms of gameplay, but in terms of control on controler, then halo wins in my opinion

2. Metroid is a mater of opinion, just like halo is, ive heard it can be good, and bad controls

3 Lol