Son1x said:
pearljammer said:
Son1x said:
pearljammer said:
dahuman said:
pearljammer said:
dahuman said:
pearljammer said:
That's a bit unfair, wouldn't you think?
There are plenty of RPGs I prefer over several main installments of Final Fantasy; Xenogears, Vagrant Story, Dragon Quest VIII, Disgaea, Valkyria Chronicles, FFT are all, in my opinion, better than FF VII and VIII.
|
good choices
|
I'm surprised that I missed Secret of Mana and Chrono Trigger though.
|
on that note, it's too bad SoM3 never came out of Japan, that game was pretty damn good, I think I'll just label you as a "mostly" Square Fanatic instead.
|
I agree, it was pretty good.
I don't think I'd agree with any label you'd try to apply. Surely you can't accurately do so from only hearing a few preferences. True, I loved just about all of their older stuff, but honestly... what JRPG fan didn't?
To be honest, I much prefer the efforts of Atlus, NIS, Intelligent Systems and especially Level-5 over Square for the past 7-8 years.
|
I prefer SoM over SD3 though. (whats with calling seiken densetsu 3 SoM3 anyway? if anything, it should be SoM2. I mean who calls Mother 3 Earthbound 3?) I don't like the battle system in SD3, I like the one with percents better.
|
I'm with you there. I, too, much prefer SoM. Being able to play multiplayer was the largest divide between the two for me.
|
Both games have 3-player support. You just have to patch SD3 to do so (you can get translation+3player patch in one I believe). As in matter of fact, me and 2 of my classmates just beat SoM few days ago and are playing SD3 now (both with 3 players).
|
Ah, I knew it had it, I just didn't think it was available to us in NA. Just wouldn't be the same though, for me at least.