bdbdbd said:
It's indeed hard to say what they do with the peripheral - if there ever will be one. It would clear things a lot, if we'd know what strategy M$ is planning to use with Natal. If it's supposed to be a peripheral, we'll see similar strategy that has been used with Eyetoy, Balance Board, and lots of other stuff and it could be bundled. If it is incremental upgrade, a new system with a launch is required for the thing to get as wide support as possible. Judging by E3, M$ marketed it as incremental upgrade, so i'm looking it from that direction. And frankly, 360 is a little too far into the generation for it to be possible to pull incremental upgrade through in the same fashion Sony pulled Dualshock through a decade ago. The type of upgrade we're talking about, could be seen in handhelds only with DSL -> DSi. Judging by the success of DS(L), it's too early to say how Nintendo manages with the upgrade. However, it's different with handhelds, since when you buy a new system, old one goes to a family member, when home consoles are rather obsolete after getting replaced. |
They are far enough into the generation, going on 5 years to pull off a relaunch. The Wii came between 4.5-5 years after the Gamecube and that was a very successful relaunch/rethink with upgraded hardware. I have really thought of the camera system that was shown for Natal as a way for many of 45M+ Xbox 360 users at the time of launch to upgrade to the current camera specification if they so chose without having to pay $2-300 for upgraded hardware. The software developers could really hit the deck running with the launch of a new console from Microsoft so long as the architecture is similar to the current generation. Probably the closer parellel with this would be the Gameboy -> Gameboy Colour transition. They can easily release new hardware and slowly transition support over 2-3 years to the new console without causing hardship to the older userbase.
Tease.







