Activision threatens to "stop supporting" Sony consoles.

[jcp234]

JEDE3 said:

"A company uses its resources to target the most financially beneficial projects. Regardless of how excessive Activision's resources are, it should always allocate those resources to projects that will have the greatest return on investment."

And everything about that points to keep on supporting PS3.

What would they do? Spend more money 360 development? That wouldn't bring in more profit but in actuality less profit since it most likely wouldnt bring in more sales then theyd lose.

Spend the money on a new game? I'm sure activision knows that there is nothing to say that the game would sell as much as not making a Ps3 CoD. On op of it being more expensive.

Make more than one CoD/GH for the 360 a year?

Save it and not do anything?

What about that points to cotinuing to support the PS3?

Just because you are not aware of better uses for the resources does not mean it does not exist.

Activision pays educated members of its team to handle these decisions.