Kasz216 said:
Not at all. I'm saying when you need money... you are more productive. When you think "Well if i don't have my job i'll have to move in with someone" is more of a motivating factor then "Well if I don't have my job, the government will give me a place to live." It's not like people in the US just die if they don't have a job. People do get healthcare and they do get money from the government. The difference is, it's only enough to get people back on their feet. It's not seen as a right. Besides concentration camps and golougs are very inefficent. Outside of a cost ratio analysis anyway i'm sure.
Fun ending to that story, everyone except for the few hardworking people there lost their jobs at the end of last week. While she was promoted and became a supervisor. |
I' m not advocating that the governent give everybody a place to live, pay their electric bill, and keep their fridge full. I'm saying that healthcare should be provided by the government. Reasons being that: Preventative medicine is cheaper than waiting for an illness to worsen and then be treated, healthy workers are more productive than unhealthy workers, and a personal belief that people should have a right to live regardless of their economic situation.







