How many users on these boards actually support "The Theory of Evolution"?

[CHYUII]

ManusJustus said:

CHYUII said:

For every action must have a cause.  We know this as truth, not necessarily as scientists but as men.

I've seen a lot of scientific and logical errors in your above posts.  I do apologize though, as I really dont want to get in a strewn out debate that will never go anywhere.  I have a scientific understanding of the universe that I cannot put aside, and you have a spiritual understanding of the unvierse that you cannot put aside.

I would, however, like to point this quote out.  You assume every action has a cause, but that is not true.  The logical problem to that is that God would require a cause too.

There is a scientific problem with that too.  In quantum physics, there are is uncertainity associated with the behaivor of particles.  This was upsetting for many athiest scientists at the time, because it meant that determinism was incorrect and that a scientific explanation of 'free will' was possible.  However, it also means that not everything has a cause.  Quantum fluctuations, which occur because of Hesinburg's Uncertainity Principle, have no cause, and it is believed by scientists that they played a role in the Big Bang.

What you are talking about is part of String Theory- as I said in all the text- the Theory is not proven and considered by some to be unprovable and thus phylosophy. (Even Witten the unifier of the 5 major theories of string theory said that the theory was murky.)

The top advocates all say that the theory is only speculation. (Even Witten)

The same justification that you give String Theory is infact an excuse that you should allow the Designer.

The Designer would not be subject to the LAWS of the system that they designed.

It is the same reason why people need String Theory to be (not that it bothers me ) and put their faith in it.

But why allow for eternity in one case and then revolk it in another?