A Factual Article everyone should read.

[joeorc]

AlkamistStar said:
@joeorc

Ummm...what?! Yea i was better off reading the 11 page article than your comments.

At the end of the day, despite what developers do, and how software changes...the HARDWARE remains the same. selnor tried to make that point at the outset of this post, but seems your just in this for arguments sake.

and I as other 's who had pointed out that the "article" that selnor is putting his faith in as Quote: fact's has quite a bit of flaw's in that artical's take on the system's. which it seem's to me unless you agree with everything that  person wrote on his "blog" compared the PS3 to the xbox360 mean's his take on it is 100% fact's.

 

well i got new's for you there are people that disagree with the man's take based on information we have had since (2006)

get it this artical is 2006. the hardware is a guideline, its the software engine's and it's software stack that drive the hardware the hardware argument Selnor is trying to make is a vailed attempt at tring to make it out like this person's "blog" take on the ps3 is viable today when a majority of which he has wrong.

for instance he claims the GPU of the ps3 is just a 7800. its based on the n47 but the picture he had for his source was far from indepth what other things the RSX has inside its design. like i pointed out @SELNOR the PS3's ppe has to do all the direction for the SPE's. which is not true .

like i said alot has changed since 2006. what % of the resources that IBM was able to attain in 2005 is not the same as they are able to attain with the same hardware.

IBM made both Processors and they have stated which processor through test's can attain the near to max of the flops the processor's could attain,the Selnor's post article contain's none of these type's of test's .AS a matter of fact where is this OP's blog "update to his own article" shas ha gathered any more experience with said hardware from the xbox360 or the PS3. it seems many people here are very Quick to take Selnor's article at face value as "fact's" instead of looking at it from many perspective's instead of just one person's take on it. .