JEDE3 said:
Cactus said:
Necromunda said:
Cactus said:
JEDE3 said:
If it doesnt involve snake then its a spin off. |
Metal Gear Solid 3 and Metal Gear Solid Peace Walker don't involve Snake.
|
What are you talking about? Last time I checked they involve Naked Snake.
|
I was basing what I said off of his definition of a spin-off:
"Same universe. Following different characher. Who has been seen in previous games. Following a different story...."
I'm just trying to prove that by calling MGS:R a spin-off based on his logic would mean that MGS3 would have to be labelled a spin-off as well. MGS3 and MGS:PW (and Portable Ops) are the only games in the series that do not feature Solid Snake, who had a large role in every single other game. By his definition, they should be considered spin-off's.
I still think we should all wait for more information to see where MGS:R fits into the overarching story before we judge it.
|
Its all following the same story though.
|
Exactly. Give me a link proving that MGS:R's story is not intertwined with the rest of the series and I'll drop my entire argument.
