By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
MontanaHatchet on 15 June 2009
Edit Thread
International Douche said:
MontanaHatchet said:
Methinks it's because Twesterm was working on the game.

...

*I'm just kidding, don't ban me!*

Anyways, I think it's funny that you made your account called "International Douche" and started right off on the site with an incredibly obvious agenda.

"Both versions are getting the same score for graphics because the overall package is solid on each platform."


Paranoia that everyone is a fanboy = member of VGchartz for too long.

Point is this, everyone complained that multiplats looked better on the 360 cos development lead on that console. We now have a game that was lead on the PS3 and it still ever so slightly looks better on the 360.

 

I demand an explanation, or sever crow eating from numerous PS3 fanboys who claimed this wouldn't be the case.

 

I fail to see the "agenda" in asking for an explanation to a valid question. You're only saying that cos you interpret it as a fanboy post, which is pretty unfair really.

I'm saying you're a fanboy because your name has "Douche" in it and one of your first posts is attacking PS3 fans and the PS3. I don't really care about the graphics contest anyways, since I mostly play the 360 and most multiplatforms look better on it. Being the "inferior" version of a multiplatform game comes down to more than graphics though. It can also include framerate hitches and longer loading times. It's very possible that the PS3 version will look worse but play better (we really don't know until we play it).