| Staude said: ^exacly. So go read it. Look for it on google. It's not heavy reading. And no I didn't read from your link. Why do you ask ? well firstly I doubt it'll provide me with any knowledge I don't know. Second of all you've kept beating around the bush and finally you post the link to a article written by whomever agrees with you, though i'm certain there are several that disprooves you. You can't argue with fact and yet you keep doing it. If we look at the numbers.. As i started out with. The ps3 has the edge. It's a fact. Why won't i use hard evidence to disprove you ?.. I don't care enough to go searching through the internet to find 1 little thing so that i can go HAH ! when i know that you'll completely disregard it in the next post as you previously has. |
Hey come on. You make yourself look silly. I have not done this to you. If you read the article you would know it's no fanboy article. It's an article that slices right through both Sony and M$ PR BS. It's not an article in an attempt to prove one is better than the other. But yopu would know that if you read it. Hence someone that did read it asked me a normal question to do with the article.
I dont listen to PR BS with no evidence. For instance concerning your fave console Sony will make you believe that PS3 can do 218 GFLOPS. Well yes with 8 SPUS and in controlled environment. In reality the top games at the end of the gen will be lucky to get 80 Gflops from PS3. Now it's up to you to understand computing and why this is FACT. Sony were clever for instance to say it in such a way that they new people would think you'd get 218 GFLOPS but they new it would be nowhere near. So they use that beautiful word Theoretical.
Really read the article. He slices through M$ PR BS to. And you thought it was some dum one sided article. It's the most factual article on the internet.
