Xxain said:
naznatips said:
MontanaHatchet said:
naznatips said:
Er... I never said anything about anyone else. See highlighted section in red.
Most JRPGs don't have great gameplay. There are a couple exceptions like Pokemon, but the general FF turn-based gameplay is very simplistic and lacks strategy... Unless you are talking about FFXII in which case it's complex but once you figure out what you are doing you can beat the game without picking up the controller in combat.
@bobobologna Confirmed that she was modeled after Cloud. source.
PS: Yeah yeah I unbanned him. Chill out people.
|
I can understand you saying that most JRPGs don't have great gameplay, but Pokemon? Seriously...what? Pokemon has the most simplistic and boring battle system of any RPG that I know of. One character at a time, 4 moves, and they're probably the easiest RPGs on the market. Made for kids with kids in mind. And if you can beat fights in FF12 without picking up the controller, than that means you designed your Gambits very well. Part of the strategy of the game, and it's entirely optional.
|
If you really think Pokemon's gameplay is simplistic you know jack shit about Pokemon. The singleplayer doesn't matter at all. Pokemon has an incredibly deep online multiplayer metagame. You probably shouldn't talk if you have no idea what you are talking about, but it's a little late for that.
|
WTF...somebody woke on wrong side of the bed this morning |
Yeah, no kidding. The series has been singleplayer since Pokemon Red first released in 1996 (Japan release). It only recently added online. I'm sure it's incredibly complex online. I'm sure there's a lot of complexity in deciding which Pokemon has the best stats, and which of the 4 moves your Pokemon is allowed to have are the best. Point is, the core of the game is incredibly basic and boring.
And Naznatips, please calm down. Your behavior today has been very inappropriate for an administrator. I'm scared to write this because I'm afraid you'll ban me just for telling you this.
