By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
tuoyo said:
Staude said:

 

Yep and it wasn't overpriced compaired to value. Theres a difference between value and what consumers see as value :p

 

And with a price like the ps3 had, it could have a technological singuality and it'd still not sell more.


What?  Think you are slightly divorced from the real world.  The makers of a product don't determine the value of a product nor do a few fan boys of that product.  The market determines the value.  The market spoke and said the value of PS3 was definitely not $600.     


Quite right, my 80 gig launch has been in my closet for a year and a half because sony wants me to spend $150 to fix the already expensive piece.  My old lady is a nurse and I have my BS degree but I would rather invest my money into the console that will be replaced for free, if it is broken.  And for all the flamers, my 360 broke twice, and both times I just said it was the RROD and they sent me a refurbished free of charge, back in two weeks flat each time.  I couldn't be happier; $150 HA!  The invisible hand said NO Way...