| sergiodaly said: xbox to have a better game then killzone 2 one year latter then kz2... but wasnt xbox much easier to program to... |
That's probably why Rage is 60fps and sandbox and not that first gen la-de-da of 30fps like those other games.
I really don't know what Sony are going to do.
| BxN said: Because you've played both games on high res HD tvs and compared them ? Really ? |
Really more like compared the graphics, noted Rage's looked better, saw the superiorty on the tech side (60fps- which alone would be enough to outdo it, but they kept going with the split-screen and the lighting and the free-roaming aspect) and come to the rather obvious conclusions.
There's really nothing wrong with it, ID are Tech gods...hell they design engines for a living, it's no surprise it's the avant' gard for current generation visuals. They just aimed for a bar much higher then anyone else. Usually if you want a 'bar settin' game you need to be:
30fps
linearity
no split-screen
Rage is none of those. I really don't know how Sony are going to mandate all PS3 exclusive must be 60FPS+ look better than Rage+ split-screen etc, because if their exclusives can't top a cross-platform game, it really is all lies.
| Taz! said: @ RAZ You fail. Heavy Rain is better looking than RE5, period |
If anything it looks worse:
Somehow I don't think the extra year + exclusivity + lack of split-screen is doing much for HR's visuals. Hell Re 5 won't even be current then, it's be all Lost Planet 2 baby.
| Steroid said: Gears of War is better looking then RE5. Why do people always talk about RE4.5 like it's the king of anything? |
IGN gave RE5 a 9.5 in the visuals department, the same as Gears of War 2 and Killzone 2..after they were released. Perhaps it's rather obvious and RE5, despite not being exclusive to any particular platform, still managed to be one of the most technically accomplished titles of this generation.
| CGI-Quality said: What does my sig have to do with your one-sided nature? |
Well when you ask me to explain how Heavy Rain has been downgraded - a pretty shared opinion if you've followed it at all since 2006, especially given the recent footage that jerks like a $2 hooker - there's nothing I can really say, no matter how truthful it may be that's likely to convince you otherwise with that sig.
| CGI-Quality said: It's hard to take someone serious when all they've EVER done is criticize. |
Perhaps Sony and partners should levy more control over their claims of visuals being only possible on certain systems, despite masses of evidence to the contrary and there would be less to critiscise.
Still if saying the cream of the PC crop like Crysis 2 and Rage is still met with "PS3 xcluseeevs is teh bettar gorphix" it's probably isn't based on comprehending a cogent reality. Sadly PS3 fanboys are always at an advantage in this case, as they don't feel a need to make sense.
