CGI-Quality said:
Killzone 2 was in development around 3 years, so what? That isn't a very long dev time for a game of this gen. IYO, it brings nothing new to the table, doesn't mean it did or it didn't, some will agree and some won't. End of the day, the 360 and PS3 were neck and neck visually until Killzone 2 hit. I found more bashing of the game due to this rather than any respect to it, despite if people favored or didn't favor it's content, which is rather sad. Gamers this gen are ungrateful, period. A game of Killzone 2's prowess was only an imagination in previous generations. Now we have the power to do so, why can't it be credited for that, as Gears of War was in 2006 when it WOWED the gaming community. Killzone 2 did this in 2009, people can either choose to accept it, or hate it, but it won't change what ACTUALLY happened. Of course they'll be games to WOW us again this gen, and for genereations to come, as it should be. We should be happy and grateful for whatever the industry has to offer, after all, if gamers are unhappy, despite the hard work of these developers, why should they even bother to continue to try to WOW us? As it seems, we're still not satisfied. my $0.02... |
Excellent post.







