Kantor said:
For fuck's sake! Why are you treating it as such a victory that a full game beat an overpriced demo in a comparison?! Why don't you ask them to do a comparison between Forza 1 and GT4, and see what happens? |
have you even watchet that review?
1. they review this as a normal game since it was released as a normal game to begin with(and Forza 2 had the same or even lower price at Prologue launch).
2. why all sony fanboys always says that Prologue is only a demo so it's doesn't count at times like this yet still claim that it's better than Forza2. sorry, but they were working on GT5 since 2004 GT5P launched 3 years later - you don't make demo for 3 years and also they won't change or improv drastically physics or handling in full game.
3. they review both games from the point of view of a racing games fan so it's not "ohh this game has better graphics so it's better", "ohh this game has more tracks/cars so it's better", but they rate physics, realism, handling, fun factor, car selection(quality over quantity), damage(mechanics, physics and visual), tracks(still quality over quantity), AI, wheel functionality. multiplayer, graphics, sound, cost and presentation are the only things outside of strict racing categories(at least here cause categories are different in some games).







