| forevercloud3000 said: agree with all except Fighting and Most Innovative Fighting:Should have been Tekken's hands down. I dont even think half the people who hate Tekken know why. It is basically the only fighter constantly moving forward instead of being stuck in forever retro land(Street Fighter IV, KOF) where we THINK the 2D is the best way to go in theory but when actually executed it feels lackluster because it is very so outdated. Tekken has more content, characters, moves, etc then the competition combined(what wahs SFIV's roster? like 20? pathetic). Most Innovative should have been MAG. I mean, Uncharted was def best game of the entire show, but it doesn't accomplish the very large technical feat MAG does. Zipper interactive were robbed. |
Since you haven't heard from anybody who actually plays at Evo or regional tournies (I do fyi) I'll fill you in on why a lot of ppl dislike Tekken. The game is all about 'safe' moves, it has no technical aspect to it compared to the games you tried to go against. Most the fighters in Tekken are absolutely useless also, and only there to fill space. An overabundance of characters ISN'T a good thing. It ruins the balance of the game, example: MVC2. MY FAVORITE FIGHTER, but in all honesty, you will only see 6-8 characters in a tournament out of the 50+. Also, Tekken's sister game VF is MUCH more balanced and uses the fighting scheme in a completely superior way, its unfortunate that it isn't widely accepted either, mainly because it resembles Tekken so much.
The Halo francise is the most overrated bland game to ever hit the console market. It provides a bad name to all FPS that even showed effort at creating an original entertaining plot.
I probably have more ps3 games than you :/
