| d21lewis said: Aside from mandatory installs, I really don't see the downside of PS3 ports. Despite any differences, they're still pretty much the same game on both platforms. I'm from the old school where there were REAL differences between console ports (NBA Jam, Mortal Kombat, Earthworm Jim). Even last gen, with the PS2, Gamecube, and Xbox, differences in ports were more obvious. Nowadays, the differences are really trivial. |
Oh, the infamous Mortal Kombat on SNES and Genesis, while the SNES version looked better in graphics, the Genesis version was completely unedited and had all the fatalities, that's a really huge difference... Then MK2 for the SNES came with all the content unedited and left the Genesis inferior graphics in evidence...
Remember the Master System vs NES in multiplatform games?, sometimes the Master System made the NES look like an Atari 2600... And games like Tony Hawk on PS1 and N64, the amazing content on PS1 was crap on N64 (except for the 3D engine)... And those PS1-Saturn 2D games like X-Men vs Street Fighter... that was a huge difference...
Now the complain is what? "there's a little difference in contrast" "where?" "right there in that spot, don't you see it?" "does it modify the overall visuals and the game experience?" "no, but that spot is because of devs having problems with the PS3, it means it's a crappy port"...WTF!!!
