By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Riachu said:
Staude said:
ZenfoldorVGI said:
These are all opinions.

A. 1up did not give it a 6.7. It got a B-/A+ but you knew that already. Metacritic always pulls that BS on B minuses.
B. You've quoted the only 2 actual low reviews here. Gamepro, and IGN. Neither review very low, for those websites.
C. You never wanted the game to succeed, and indeed are simply here to play up the negative reviews for it, while conveniently disregarding the good ones. You are probably an Infamous fan.
D. GameInformer gave Elite Beat Agents a 6.75
E. You don't really consider GI a credible review source, you just said you did to propagate your lie.

All of these things are obviously true, imho.

I can't prove it, but I think that I know it is absolutely true.

A. When games are graded in scores like that, meta critic will get specified exacly what the score is as they've said previously they do. in terms of what they deal with. In other words they've mailed the guy who reviewed it and was then told it was a 6.7...

 

C. How do you know wether he did or not ? Just because someone likes infamous doesn't mean they don't like prototype. Assumptions are your enemy.

The rest I don't really care about so i'm not gonna comment on them.

 

How do those letter grades work?  I always though a B-=7.5.  This is why I have never been a fan of them.

Metacritic gets informed by the reviewer on a case to case basis.



Check out my game about moles ^