De85 said:
Thank you for having the intelligence to understand what I was trying to say l instead of just literally interpreting every word. For the record, I have no problem with sony moneyhatting games. If they made a deal with rockstar great for them. What I do have a problem with is the deluded sony fanboys who think devs work with sony out of the goodness of their hearts, but won't look at MS unless they;re getting paid to. |
One could certainly argue that the PS3 has more untapped potential and ability for expansion in many ways over the 360 however and that some companies/developers interested in more of a challenge could look at the PS3 as a system to really push this untapped potential and make something spectacular or out of the ordinary.
I easily could see companies making games for the PS3 out of the goodness of their hearts because untapping the potential of the PS3 could be a very rewarding nugget for them. Where as the 360 is pretty much restricted at this point. The inclusion of Blu-Ray opens avenues and doors for developers that limit the 360.
In many ways, I find it similar to the PS2 / XBOX of last generation. I'm not so sure Microsoft money hatted Bioware or Bethesda to make games for the Xbox as much as these companies wanted to test out their game on a console with a little more untapped or under utilized potential.







