By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
seece said:
luisgvm said:
seece said:
luisgvm said:
seece said:
I think when these devs make there all powerful game and get lower than expect sales, they'll see PS3 exclusive was not the right way.

but, how do you know thia one is going to sell bad?.

I didn't say it would sell bad. However good it sells (and it will never do anything more than 3 million) unless this game is aimed at the Japanese, then it would of benefitted it more to be on the 360 also or even a 360 exclusive.

oh i see. well i dont agree with you. i believe this game could be aimed to americans or any audience and be ps3 exclusive and still sell good. well thats my opinion. sure it may sell more if it is multi or 360 exclusive but the fact that is ps3 exclusive doesnt mean is going to get lower than expected sales.

Maybe "lower than expected sales" isn't the right term. I think you get what I mean though, they're not maximizing the sales this game could do being exclusive to the PS3.

Of course! Just like Valve could maximize their sale by including a PS3 version of their shooters, their core reason seems more valid in this regard (PS3 is to difficult to program!) and while I'm slightly skeptical, I also willing to give them the benefit, but the point is some developer choose not to for whatever reason, and chances are they're unlikely to tell you how they've come to this decision become it almost always has something to do with commercial incentives of some sort.

Anyways, I think the dev here is giving the response he knows will cause the most contraversy, its nothing more than a cheap PR stunt.