Kasz216 said:
Guys like Shaq are rarer? No. They're just more valuable. Great Shooting Guards are rarer. There are more great Centers then there are Shooting Guards. You've got Jordan in one tier. West and Byrant in a second tier... then George Gervin in a third... then who? Allen Iverson? Now great Centers... you can name tons. Kareem, Shaq, Russel, Wilt, Olajuwan.... There are tons of Centers at the top of their game in comparison. You would take Shaq over Kobe. You would not take Shaq over MJ though. If a shooting guard isn't as important as a center then the shooting guard is going to have to be a hell of a lot better then the center to be considered a better player. Nobody is going to argue that Adam Vinatari is more valuable then Tom Brady because Vinatari is better at his position then Tom Brady is as it his. |
This is where I really disagree. How many centers have put up Shaq's numbers? 2? 3? And the rest aren't even close to his dominance during his prime. With centers, you pretty much have to eliminate anyone who played pre-1970 because they simply wouldn't cut it as a center in today's game. Hell, many would have a hard time playing power forward in today's NBA. It's almost like comparing a deadball player to a modern MLB hitter. It just doesn't make sense given the huge differences in the game.
Whereas when you look at shooting guards, there are loads of them who put up great numbers not that far behind guys like Kobe and Jordan. Just today, you have guys like Wade and McGrady who are just close enough talent-wise to make the difference negligible. Back in the day, you had guys like Drexler who filled the same role. Which is why I'd take the center first over almost any guard, even some of the best guards ever like Kobe.
Even Jordan had a hard time winning without a competent big man.
Or check out my new webcomic: http://selfcentent.com/