Gamepro magazine awards Microsoft the best of the big three at E3

[Jereel Hunter]

Mr Khan said:

Darth Tigris said:
So why is everyone being so judgmental about the conclusions from the press THAT WAS ACTUALLY AT THE EVENT and some had the actual opportunity TO TRY THIS STUFF HANDS ON?

Look long and hard into the mirror and you will find the answer, whether you want to accept it or not . . .

Sorry we're questioning the almighty and divine wisdom of the sainted. Their divinity will be acknowledged. But not right now

Anyhoo, what is the deal? If you look at it from a pure prospective of content, i think that a clear Sony > Nintendo = Microsoft lineup appears. And that's coming from someone who has never owned anything other than Nintendo consoles

Unless they're judging it in terms of presentation, but that's just stupid. The content that comes out is what should matter.

It depends on point of view. Sony showed the most, but it wasn't all 2009 releases. Sony, as usual showed the most/coolest games but you won't be seeing them this year. And content is rated based on how soon you'll have it.

Also, from the view of many (including myself) the potential of Natal was the most thrilling prospect presented at E3.