badgenome said:
That makes no sense. He put Rockstar in the same category as Miyamoto or Bungie, so he's obviously talking about game quality - even though he lied and agreed with your interpretation because he had been called out on his delusions. As for talk of "delays," given that it's Sony (who always announces shit way too early) and Rockstar (who are super ambitious, and especially in this case where they're comparing it to GTA), and the fact that we didn't see any screens, a teaser, or anything but a logo... I don't think it's bashing to suggest that it's probably a 2011 game. Regarding PS3 excusivity, if it's wrong to bash the idea, it's also wrong of forevercloud to misconstrue the article to say that Rockstar is developing a PS3 exclusive just because they have soooooo much confidence in the Playstation brand. I thought everyone knew by now that Rockstar agreed to make a new game for Sony after being allowed to take GTA multiplatform. It's also pretty funny that he's accusing Microsoft of moneyhatting with every other breath, and that he point blank said that Sony had some kind of moral objection to paying for exclusivity, but I guess that's neither here nor there. |
Exactly. The only thing being bashed is Sony fanboy propaganda in favor of common sense and real world logic.
I'm not a fanboy, I just try to tip the balance in favor of logic and common sense.
