Killergran said:
And this here is why we won't really see many 'Hardcore HD motion controlled' games, according to Malstrom. (I edited your post a bit so I could read it more easilly) |
The above is so not true.
Option 6. Use the free Wiimote + libraries to add motion controls cheaply to your game. It cant cost much if the cheapest Wii games cost less than a 2,500,000 and only part of the cost is due to the interface.
Option 7. Deciding that now that the Wii doesn't have a monopoly on motion controls that developing on the Wii is 'boring' and games like Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 should be HD exclusive just so your developers have time to play around with the fun new interfaces.
Option 8. Invent a fun new excuse to not work on the Wii.
Option 9. Figure out how theres a similarity between a pointer and a mouse, if theres a similarity then the pointer may be able to replace a mouse.
Option 10. Use the knowledge gained from inflicting crappy games on the Wii audience, seemingly in an intentional effort to keep it from achieving its >>>60% market share manifest destiny to make good games on the HD consoles since you've passed the learning curve already.
Option 11. Take the budget for adding motion support from the Wii port. After all they keep telling you that Wii games are cheap to make.
Option 12. Realise that you only make innovative games, not cookie cutter efforts. Use that to justify using Natal because its so much different. Don't answer any emails about why you spoke out against the Wiimote interface and refused to make Wii games.
Tease.