360 maxed out, PlayStation3 isn't.

[NightAntilli]

wholikeswood said:

mrstickball said:

Imperial said:

 

I'm one of those people who expect exclusives to look better than multiplatforms because of the obvious technical limitations the developers face when doing either , you of all people should know that , it counts for both consoles.

We can argue endlessly on particular games but if we look at the bigger picture , the PS3 wins cummilativley , always setting the new standard. You obviously don't realise this because of your blind dedication to the 360.

Despite my strong affiliation with the playstation brand , I still know what's what.

...Says the guy with the Sony Defense Force signature.

You know, you'd hope that a much more expensive system would have a slight edge on graphical capabilities.

Really, would you? This seems a nonsense statement to me - it could justify its extra cost with something else, like a more advanced media storage for example (in this case, Blu-ray).

@ Selnor: Take the fanboy goggles off, buddy. If you think Uncharted 2 looked inferior to Alan Wake or Assassin's Creed, then you're talking nonsense. Simple as that.

 

No matter how you put it, a game looking better to the eye does not directly mean that system is way more powerful than the other, especially with the small differences between the X360 and the PS3. Yet I still see a lot of people saying "the PS3 has X, it looks better than Y on the X360, so the PS3 is more powerful".