deathcape said:
it's not as much made up..as I don't like ripoffs...I would love to play a 1:1 StarWars game...but if I had to choose between Wii or PS3..it would be Wii, since I get to actually walkaround with the control stick, doesn't cost as much as an HD version and could be fun IF DONE RIGHT the problem with not caring about who wins..means the Wii gets the short end of the stick..the dumbed down watered down port..while the PS3 f.e: gets the actually good game..wich I cannot afford -.- so...it's a simple matter of: what can I actually purchase? and is it worth it to pay 60 bucks for an HD game wich lasts around 10 hours?..and has no replay value? or an SD game wich is forced to adopt other values than just cinematic epereinces and great graphics to keep gamers hooked..probably: better gameplay, more gameplay modes etc?
*sighs* it's pretty much how I think anyway...I haven't seen many HD games that impress me yet...just a few that turned my head.. sad..considering I loved the competition's games last time around |
The patents for the PS3 more indicate that it includes a control stick as well so you don't have anything to fear from that. However you know, there are many HD games which also have a lot of replayability and I would say as a whole the length and gameplay of games have been getting better on average. Just give it some time and a little faith, im sure you'll find that as the generation progresses things will improve for you.
Tease.