How is Microsofts Milo superior than Sony's Eyepet?

[Spankey]

drpunk said:

akuseru said:

IMO EyePet beats Milo to the ground. It scans your drawings and you can control things with a controller not your hands and shitty hand gestures. You can make it look different and it reacts to the surroundings you create and your body and stuff. Looks pretty neat. MS tech is cool, but not for games, I want buttons to press...

You question everything Milo, yet you don't ask yourself how eyepet knows you've drawn a plane.

out of interest, have you ever tried MS's voice to text recognition software? or even text to speech?

If they have trouble with that, how much trouble will this cause?

Don't get me wrong, Natal is amazing, as is Milo, but the difficulties in getting it to work properly are huge.

then there's slang and dialects to work into it. very frigging difficult.

A sketch of a plane is peanuts for computers to recognise in comparrison

But if MS says they can do it, I'm not going to argue. that's one talented bunch of people.