How is Microsofts Milo superior than Sony's Eyepet?

[akuseru]

IMO, Milo is just a big fat haux.. I have no belief in that MS demo what so ever! How can Milo understand what I say if I for example talk in broken english, or in a different accent? How can he understand my mother tounge? How can he know what my voice or face is like when I am sad? or angry? How can he respond differently to all the thousands of questions I have? Watching that Milo crap was just painful. I think all that was scripted, no doubt about it. Cool technology, but for now, still just the usual MS haux. And the name Natal sucks ass. seriously...

IMO EyePet beats Milo to the ground. It scans your drawings and you can control things with a controller not your hands and shitty hand gestures. You can make it look different and it reacts to the surroundings you create and your body and stuff. Looks pretty neat. MS tech is cool, but not for games, I want buttons to press...

 

waron said:

sorry but fail.
Milo has:
Emotiona AI that Microsoft was working on for like 8 years,
can recognise person, voice and face,
can "understand" you and respond to gamer/user emotions(just read Molyneux interview),
you can go into the game(water part of Milo demo),

EyePet is pretty much EyeToy minigames, but in tamagochi version also if i remember those creatures can "draw" only things designed and implemented by developer. although it looks fun but is nowhere near as complex as Milo and Milo is still part of bigger project we only got a small glimpse at it.

I wonder.. How the heck can Milo "understand" me? Real people does not even understand each other, so I am very puzzled about how that Milo dude can. Milo can understand what developers make him understand, nothing more, nothing less... I have no faith in that stuff, especially no faith in what Molyneux talks about.. As we can see with his last games, his words cannot be trusted.