Gamepro declares Microsoft the winner!!

[bobobologna]

starcraft said:

superchunk said:
They're logic is flawed simply based on how they perceive the motion controls shown between the three.

They are basing it on pure technology where MS>SN>NT. However, you must base it on actual purpose and design limitations and that is can it play my game and hopefully improve the experience. That is clearly NT>>SN>=MS simply since you can't do a lot of genres with either SN or MS products.

I would put my next paycheck on the fact that MS and SN will have another part for their systems that is somehow similar to a nunchuk in order for it to be feasible on core game types.

Pardon me, but with a little bit of intuitive development what genres cannot be done on the Microsoft motion system?  Bear in mind that the system can track individual fingers, and combine motion sensing with audio sensing and standard controller inputs.

There is no getting around it, Nintendo got to motion control first.  But I think it is abundantly clear that much more can be done with Microsoft's system game-wise.  Whether that will actually happen on the other hand...

 

Ok, I am DESPERATE for people to give me practical applications of Natal.  Without any other accessories.  After all, it's controls without the controller, right?  So please enlighten me about what kind of games will use Natal.  How will the games control?  Will the controls work BETTER than a gamepad?

EDIT:  And the instant you add an accessory, it becomes nothing more than the PS Eye demo.