Gamepro declares Microsoft the winner!!

[superchunk]

starcraft said:

superchunk said:
They're logic is flawed simply based on how they perceive the motion controls shown between the three.

They are basing it on pure technology where MS>SN>NT. However, you must base it on actual purpose and design limitations and that is can it play my game and hopefully improve the experience. That is clearly NT>>SN>=MS simply since you can't do a lot of genres with either SN or MS products.

I would put my next paycheck on the fact that MS and SN will have another part for their systems that is somehow similar to a nunchuk in order for it to be feasible on core game types.

Pardon me, but with a little bit of intuitive development what genres cannot be done on the Microsoft motion system?  Bear in mind that the system can track individual fingers, and combine motion sensing with audio sensing and standard controller inputs.

There is no getting around it, Nintendo got to motion control first.  But I think it is abundantly clear that much more can be done with Microsoft's system game-wise.  Whether that will actually happen on the other hand...

How would you shoot, aim, walk/run, hide, reload, etc in an FPS with no actual joystick and a couple of buttons?

I would be glad to be wrong, but it isn't feasible to physically walk/run around your house, jump up and down, etc.

Also not feasible to constantly be saying these commands for voice to work as many times there is a lot of other stuff happening in your house that would conflict.

To me the burden of proof is on those saying it can do it when even MS's demo didnt' show this. I know the greater majority of IPs would not work, but let's just start with this really big one, FPS or shooter in general.