thx1139 said:
So what is your definition of "more advanced"? It isnt more advanced hardware. It isnt more advanced software. It isnt a piece of hardware where the some of the parts adds up to a complex device. |
THe problem here is that you're thinking in terms of linear progression, which is absolutely fine, but you can't think in terms of linear progression across two different methodologies.
WM+ is more advanced than the Wiimote.
Natal is more advanced than the Eyetoy (assuming the Eyetoy doesn't use an object to perceive depth and so forth).
The two lines of advancement are not directly comparable. It would be like saying that the Wright brother's first airplane is more advanced than a hydrogen cell car, because it can fly and the car can't.







