Squilliam said:
If getting sued was the disincentive then they wouldn't need an informal or formal agreement to back it up if the legal contracts were binding. If the legal contracts aren't binding then the contracts themselves are moot. Either way if they were colluding its against the trade laws which are in place to help the markets run efficiently.
|
Yea, because so far the governments been doing a bang up job of making sure the markets run efficiently.







