By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Yridian on 03 June 2009
Edit Thread
jetrii said:
Keep_the_change said:

 

First place: goes obviously to wii motion plus since it is here already, revamping an experience Wii owners have since '06 when Sony and Microsoft weren't interested in fad gimmicks. It acts with 1:1 flawlessly accuracy.

 

Second place: Sony's purple wand. It acts with 1:1 flawlessly accuracy just like the WM+ but it requires a camera. Also, second hand attachment seems not to be available.

 

Third Place: Not in the same field as Sony and Nintendo Motion Control. Feels like a revamped Eye Toy, adds nothing really new in the gaming market. Project Milo was confirmed by IGN that the trailer shown was pure bullshit, unresponsive character that was just able to recognize a shirt color with the help of a developer controlling the game. For further enjoyment just look at my sig.

 

WELL BAM! There it is   :D

You have no idea how Natal or 3D cameras work, don't pretend you do. I am writing a fairly long thread comparing all 3 of the technologies which you may enjoy. I suggest waiting until I finish it before posting more clueless misinformation that to be completely honest, just makes you look ignorant.

 

Read your thread, and it was an interesting read. Though I don't see how the original poster of this thread is ignorant. We all saw with our eyes that it wasn't quite matching your body's movements. But again, this is a minor problem. If I'm playing say a baseball game, and it projects the angle of my swing accurately so that I hit the ball when I'm supposed to, that's all that matters. And in the demo, with the girl, she seemed to hit the red balls accurately. Though it was hard to tell. She was moving too fast, and it was obvious the character on screen wasn't keep up. Again, it's a minor problem, but isn't one of the selling points of Natal is that what you do, the character mimics exactly?

I think you're looking at this wrong. You're impressed with the technology involved (Which is rather impressive) and not looking at it from the gaming perspective. Would the casual gamer be impressed by this? Would any worthwhile game be made for it to help sell more consoles? These are valid questions, ones that will get answers soon.

Again, don't look at the technology involved. Look at how that technology is applied. Doing so, I believe the original poster isn't so 'ignorant' afterall.