| axumblade said: I wouldn't assume that there would be great quality behind the Wii camera as there would be behind microsofts. The most interesting thing was the interactivity between the game and the person through Natal at the Microsoft conference. Also flipping through menus without the use of a controller was a really cool feature as well. While I think that the Ubisoft camera might be interesting, I wouldn't exactly say that it's going to have nearly the innovations that Natal has... |
THe physical layer of tech is the same, its all data response/what to look for that makes the Natal so innovative. Once you have a motion sensing camera, it just needs to know what to look for, aka a program to tell it what gesture do what and to send it in. Its I/O 101.
In the end, as said before, this takes the market that MS is aiming for (casual) away. Especially with the Wii camera coming sooner, it will make it look like the MS camera was an afterthought to the casuals.
MS should have fine tuned this tech for their next gen system instead of try to cash in on casual gaming. The 360 simply isn't a casual system, nor has anything to get the attention of the casual market
